Corporate Transparency Act: Whiplash on BOI

Whiplash on BOI

The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated an injunction against the enforcement of the Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reporting requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). This ruling supports the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), which argued that the rule unfairly burdens small businesses.

The CTA mandates that businesses disclose financial beneficiaries to combat organized crime and terrorism. However, the law includes severe penalties for non-compliance, such as hefty fines and potential imprisonment for business owners. Critics, including NFIB, have called these requirements onerous and questioned their constitutional validity.

Rob Smith, senior attorney for NFIB’s Small Business Legal Center, welcomed the decision, saying, “The court’s reinstatement of the nationwide injunction is a welcome sigh of relief for small businesses. Since being told earlier this week that they must urgently submit their BOI reports, our nation’s small businesses have experienced enormous chaos and confusion. Thankfully, the court’s latest decision recognizes that the CTA and BOI reporting requirements pose serious constitutional questions. It also provides Main Streets across the country with a reprieve from this harmful mandate while our lawsuit proceeds.”

Earlier in December, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas had issued a preliminary injunction halting enforcement of the CTA. However, on December 23, the Fifth Circuit overturned that decision, allowing the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to enforce the law. This latest ruling reinstates the injunction, temporarily halting enforcement again.

If upheld, the CTA’s reporting requirements would affect 32 million small businesses nationwide, including 300,000 NFIB members. NFIB highlighted the pending “Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act” in Congress, which aims to repeal the CTA and permanently relieve small businesses of the BOI reporting obligations.

 

Information contained in this Memo is intended for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion, nor is it a substitute for the professional judgment of an attorney.  It is likely considered advertising.  Epps & Coulson, LLP encourages you to call to discuss these matters as they apply to you or your business.  Epps & Coulson, LLP has staff licensed in France and affiliated Counsel offices in New York and Connecticut with lawyers also admitted in Connecticut, District of Columbia Massachusetts (pending), New Jersey, Hawaii, European Union, England and Wales, France (Paris Bar) and Sweden.

EPPS & COULSON, LLP
Attorneys admitted to practice in California, New York, Colorado, Texas, and Oregon
www.eppscoulson.com
www.companiescounsel.com