Arbitration Agreements/Employee Handbooks – Update Yours A new case (Ford v. The Silver F, Inc.) highlights how California employee handbooks with outdated arbitration language can undermine an employer's ability to require arbitration of employee claims, even when the legal landscape shifted in the employer’s favor in 2022 with the U.S....
CALIFORNIA PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ACT (PAGA) CHANGES Employers: the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) is being amended to impose new limits on who can bring a PAGA action and the scope of Labor Code violations that a plaintiff employee can pursue; it will also create caps on penalties for...
CALIFORNIA PROHIBITS ENFORCEMENT OF ANY EMPLOYEE ARBITRATION REQUIREMENT AS A CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT On June 22nd, we updated clients on the U.S. Supreme Court employee arbitration ruling in the Viking River Cruise case.[1] We informed that the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) preempts prior California...
SUPREME COURT RULES ON PAGA ARBITRATION The United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Moriana v. Viking River Cruises, Inc., that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) overrules, in part, California Supreme Court authority limiting the application of arbitration agreements to representative actions brought under California’s Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”)....